IM Fabian Bänziger (SUI, 2426) vs GM Velimir Ivic (SRB, 2601) · ½-½
Board 4, Switzerland vs Serbia · Caro-Kann Defence, Advance Variation (B12) · 90 minutes for 40 moves, then 30 minutes, plus 30 seconds per move
By Professor Zugzwang AI Coach . This analysis was written by a Bogner Chess AI coach.
Board four, White, against a grandmaster rated 2601. The other three boards were as good as done by then: Sebastian Bogner had lost to Sarana, Nico Georgiadis had lost to Indjic, Peng Li Min had drawn Predke. The match score read 0.5 to 2.5, and the question on board four was no longer whether Switzerland would win the match, but whether the young IM could make life difficult for an opponent 175 rating points above him. Half a point here is still half a point against a grandmaster, and a young player's clock counts every move.
And the clock is the thread that runs through the whole week. For the third time in this event Fabian Bänziger fell under five minutes before move forty, and this time earlier than ever: from move twenty-seven onwards. Two thinks of over a quarter of an hour stood in the way, one on move seven, the other on move fifteen, and neither led to the strongest move.
The outpost wants to be occupied: 15.Nd6
From a Caro-Kann Advance a position has arisen in which White holds one thing and everything else arranges itself around it: the d6 square. His own pawn on e5 covers it, the black pawn on c6 does not interfere, and the knight on e4 can go there in one move. That is not a detail, that is the core of the position, and the strongest move is the one that uses it: , hitting f7 and b7 at once.
After the knight on d6 is not a piece you get rid of again, and White stands a good half pawn better. The move played was , and it is not a catastrophe, but it gives back half of the advantage: four fifths of a pawn become a bare third. Fabian Bänziger spent sixteen minutes and twenty-five seconds on this move, the longest think of the game.
The rule behind it fits into one line: when the outpost is there and the piece is ready, occupy first and organise second, not the other way around. A rook on c1 is the preparation of a move that forces nothing without the occupation of d6. The knight on d6 is the move the preparation is supposed to prepare.
GM Velimir Ivic (SRB, 2601)
IM Fabian Bänziger (SUI, 2426)
The wrong wing in time trouble: 31.h5
The position is level. Two black knights on d5 and f5, a white central pawn on e5, neither side has more than a quarter of a pawn in hand. The one break that forces anything is , and it is concrete: the pawn attacks the knight on f5, and after White keeps the balance and dries out the position.
The move played was , with one minute fifty-eight left after the move. The h-pawn attacks nothing. The answer is the move White no longer had the time to calculate: , and with it the black centre breaks open. , and the position has swung from zero to a good half pawn in Black's favour.
Objectively that was a tactical error, not a move in the wrong order. From a human point of view it was the move you make in time trouble because it does not seem to require calculating any of the opponent's replies. The rule sits exactly there: in time trouble you fix your eye on the move that touches the opponent's piece, not on the one that pushes a pawn of your own. A pawn move on the edge changes the position by one square; the pawn in the centre that you let attack you changes it in every square.
GM Velimir Ivic (SRB, 2601)
IM Fabian Bänziger (SUI, 2426)
The scramble to move forty
From move thirty-four onwards Fabian Bänziger did not have a full minute on the clock, and between move thirty-four and move forty he never once climbed back above two. In sequences like this it is preparation that decides, not calculation: was the only move that still held the position, the only one that defends against Qb3, the trade that removes the queen from the board before it does anything, to cover the second rank. All played in seconds, all the best move.
The one move in the chain that the clock really contaminated is . The knight retreats, instead of the that targets the knight on d5: , and the position is only a good tenth of a pawn worse. After White slips to a good four tenths of a pawn behind, and that is the value the game takes into the ending.
The rule for your own clock is a familiar one: in time trouble you play the moves you have calculated already, and stop trying to calculate the ones you would like to play now. Fabian Bänziger reached move forty with one minute and twelve seconds, more seconds than the run of moves between should have allowed. That is a craft in itself.
GM Velimir Ivic (SRB, 2601)
IM Fabian Bänziger (SUI, 2426)
Defending with rook and knight
A rook and knight ending against rook and knight, three pawns against three on the kingside, all in one column. The material is unremarkable, the verdict is level-headed: for Black it is a good tenth of a pawn, less than the width of a square. A grandmaster with twenty-two minutes and White with thirteen plays such a position out for thirty moves. The draw has to be defended, not offered.
The white moves read like a manual on holding: puts the knight active, ties the e6 pawn to its defender, takes the seventh rank, pins the knight on f6. No move is more than a fraction off the best, no sequence hands a grandmaster anything. When the white clock falls under five minutes a second time from move fifty-six, the defence is already standing.
The rule for endings with equal material and pawns on one side is the quiet neighbour of the whole endgame theory: without a passed pawn and without a weak king, there is barely a way to win a thing like this. The defender does not need to outdo the activity of his pieces, he needs to hold it. Fabian Bänziger did that, and the repetition together with the closing was the logical conclusion.
GM Velimir Ivic (SRB, 2601)
IM Fabian Bänziger (SUI, 2426)
Verdict
Half a point with White against a grandmaster rated 2601, in a match Switzerland lost 1 to 3. The game has two themes and the two belong together. One is the clock, which for the third time this olympiad fell under five minutes before move forty, and earlier than ever. The other is the one move that turned the small advantage on move fifteen into a draw and the equal position on move thirty into a fight for the half point: would have been the one, the move that occupies instead of prepares. That Fabian Bänziger then held the forty-four moves after the mistake with everything the craft has on offer is the day's news. In a match already lost, board four brought back the half point that boards one and two no longer had.
Moves
½-½
Was this analysis useful?