GM Aydin Suleymanli (AZE, 2664) vs GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535) · 1-0
Board 2, Switzerland vs Azerbaijan · Nimzo-Indian Defence, Normal Variation, Botvinnik System (E49)
By Professor Zugzwang AI Coach . This analysis was written by a Bogner Chess AI coach.
On board two Nico Georgiadis had Black against Aydin Suleymanli, rated 2664, one of Azerbaijan's most gifted young grandmasters. Nico chose the Nimzo-Indian and let White steer into the Botvinnik System with : White gets the bishop pair and a broad centre, Black gets the better pawns and the job of attacking that centre before it starts rolling.
That job was done, and done cleanly. After fifteen moves the game was practically level. Then came a single knight move that looks natural and tips the game over. This is why the game is the best example of the round for something a coach says constantly and that is still hard to learn: before you advance a piece, ask what your opponent can do with it.
The right moment: 11...e5
In the Botvinnik System White has the c3 and d4 pawns and wants to follow with e4 and f4. While that centre stands, the bishop pair is dangerous. So Black has to disturb it, and the only question is when.
Nico plays at exactly the moment when the white king is still in the centre and the h1 rook is out of play. After the black queen is active, the d4 pawn is gone, and the b2 bishop stares into empty space. The move is entirely sound, the slightly slower was just as good.
The decision convinces me because it answers the opening's basic question instead of postponing it. When you play a bishop pair versus better structure position, your timing is half the game: every move you wait with the freeing break is a move your opponent uses to stabilise the centre. After the position was level and Black had achieved everything the opening promised.
GM Aydin Suleymanli (AZE, 2664)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
The moment it all hung on: 17...Ne4
This is the key position of the game, and it looks harmless. White stands half a pawn better, no more. What matters is the knight on h4: it has exactly one good square, f5, and from there it attacks the e7 queen and works together with the b2 bishop against g7. One move earlier was a shade more precise than , but that is a nuance.
The move played is , and it is understandable: the knight goes to a central square and looks active. But it leaves f6, and with that two things happen at once: the f5 square stays available, and the long diagonal of the b2 bishop down to g7 is suddenly open. After the queen has to move and defend g7 at the same time, and the only move that does both is , where she is in the way rather than in the game. In a single move half a pawn has become three.
The right move was the modest . It looks feeble because it loosens squares around the king, but it takes f5 away from the knight, and with that White has no plan left. After it the position is practically level.
The lesson, and it is an uncomfortable one: a move that improves one of your own pieces is not automatically a good move. When your opponent has exactly one idea, check first whether your candidate stops that idea. If it does not, play the ugly move that does.
GM Aydin Suleymanli (AZE, 2664)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
A second chance after 18.Nf5
The knight on f5 is a monster: it attacks the queen, targets g7 together with the b2 bishop, and the g-pawn cannot chase it while the long diagonal is open. Nico finds the best move with , and that is no small compliment: the two alternatives and both fail to the knight crashing in on g7.
And then Nico got lucky. The strongest move was , chasing the queen further and leaving the e4 knight hanging in mid-air, which would have put White more than three pawns ahead. Suleymanli chose the solid , and suddenly the damage was limited to just under two pawns. was exactly right as well, since loses material at once. A bad position, but one in which you can still fight.
What you can take home: if you find the toughest move twice in a row after a mistake, you often get a second chance. Do not assume the worst, keep setting your opponent problems. Even a 2664 grandmaster sometimes picks the safe move over the strongest one.
GM Aydin Suleymanli (AZE, 2664)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
The pawn avalanche: 21.f4 and 22.f5
Now you see why the black queen on g5 is a problem: it stands in the f-pawn's way and gets chased with tempo. Nico plays , and this is the second error, handing back the chance he had just been given. The right move was , because from h6 the queen keeps both f4 and her own king position in view, and Black would have stayed worse but playable. After comes , the pawn takes the last air away from the f8 knight and the bishop, and just under two pawns have become three again.
The rest is a cleanly played attack: puts the second knight alongside the first, swings the rook along the fourth rank towards the king, and after the black king is open. and clear the pawns away, opens the last file, and after Nico resigned, because the knight on g6, pinned along the g-file, is lost.
For your own games the mechanism matters more than the moves: White did not sacrifice a single piece. The whole attack consists of pawns advancing with tempo, because every black piece they attack has nowhere good to go. That is what an attack growing out of a positional advantage looks like.
GM Aydin Suleymanli (AZE, 2664)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
Verdict
Fifteen faultless moves, and then two that cost everything. Nico handled the opening exactly right, played the freeing break at the best possible moment and stood practically level. was not a blunder in the usual sense, nothing hangs and it looks good. It simply overlooks that the opponent had exactly one idea, and its name was Nf5. With Suleymanli let him back into the game once more, but handed that second chance straight back, and White conducted the attack that followed without a slip. Against 2664 this is the most expensive kind of mistake: not the hung pawn, but the missed plan.
Moves
1-0
Was this analysis useful?