arrow_back Back to the Olympiad overview

Chess Olympiad Samarkand 2026 · 17 September 2026

Round 2

Pairings

Switzerland vs Kosovo

Round 2 · 17 September 2026

Board White Black Evaluation Result
1 GM Bogner, Sebastian 2547 IM Saraci, Nderim 2453 1-0
2 FM Uruci, Endrit 2312 GM Georgiadis, Nico 2535 Report arrow_forward ½-½
3 GM Peng, Li Min 2568 FM Asllani, Muhamet 2229 Report arrow_forward 1-0
4 CM Saraci, Korab 2223 FM Federer, Colin 2269 Report arrow_forward 0-1
Loading game

Live broadcast by lichess.org

Analysis

The game in detail

GM Sebastian Bogner (SUI, 2547) vs IM Nderim Saraci (KOS, 2453) · 1-0

Board 1, Switzerland vs Kosovo · Catalan Opening, Open Defence, Classical Line (E05)

By Professor Zugzwang AI Coach . This analysis was written by a Bogner Chess AI coach.

After the 3.5 to 0.5 against Burundi, board one offered a very different opponent: Nderim Saraci, an International Master rated 2453, barely a hundred points below Sebastian and therefore exactly in the range where nothing is handed to you. With White, Sebastian chose the Catalan, perhaps the most patient of all openings: a small edge, a long breath, no risk.

The game lasted 67 moves and went a long time without a single combination. It is still one of the best teaching games of this olympiad, because it shows how half a pawn of advantage is turned into a won rook and bishop ending over thirty moves. Switzerland won the match against Kosovo 3.5 to 0.5.

The retreat almost nobody plays: 12.Qc1

The Catalan lives off the g2 bishop. Black grabs the pawn with and tries to hold it with ...a6 and ...b5, White answers and takes it back with . That is the standard bargain: White spends a tempo, Black gives up a pawn structure without weaknesses. After that the real theme of the game starts, the fight for the long diagonal from a8 to h1.

The black bishop tours , chasing the white queen in front of it. Most players would now play , which looks active and eyes b7. Sebastian plays , a move you have to look for at the board: on c1 the queen blocks nothing, it has not really left the c-file, and above all it will not lose another tempo when the bishop comes again. It is the best move in the position.

The lesson: a retreat is not an admission. When an enemy piece chases you with tempo, find the square where it can never hit you again, even if that square looks ugly. Two moves later the reward arrives: and trade the bishops on Sebastian's terms.

IM Nderim Saraci (KOS, 2453)

GM Sebastian Bogner (SUI, 2547)

After 12.Qc1: the queen retreats all the way to the back rank. Black to move.

An honest decision: 19.d5

Black has freed himself with and , and White has to choose. The move played is , the break. After the position is practically level, all the tension is gone.

I would have preferred or here. Both keep the tension, leave the d4 pawn where it is and hold on to a small but real edge. The difference is not half a pawn, but it exists. For an olympiad match on board one the decision is still understandable: a dry position against a 2453 player is not a bad deal when you know your patience is the longer one. That is exactly how it went.

What you can take home: a pawn break in the centre always resolves the position, in both directions. Ask first whether you can still win the resulting position or only still not lose it. When both answers are the same, prefer the move that keeps the tension.

IM Nderim Saraci (KOS, 2453)

GM Sebastian Bogner (SUI, 2547)

After 18...e5: Black hits the centre. White to move: break through or hold?

Thirty moves of patience, then the error

From move 26 something happens that is far too rare in club chess: nothing happens. , , , , , , . The rook looks for the best file, the king steps to safety with , the pawns are prepared. Not a single move hangs anything, not a single move gives anything away, and with every move Black's job gets more unpleasant.

That is exactly what this way of playing aims at. After and Black has twice in a row left squares he needed to hold, and the small edge is suddenly a real one. In the diagram wins most clearly, because the h5 pawn drops while the rook on c8 owns the eighth rank. What was played is , followed by , a repetition.

As a coach I am of two minds about that. Objectively was the move, and after it was available a second time and did not come either. Practically, repeating moves in a clearly better position is a proven way to gain time on the clock and let the opponent stew, and Sebastian never lost the thread afterwards. Remember both halves: take the chance when it comes, but do not lose your head when you only repeat once.

IM Nderim Saraci (KOS, 2453)

GM Sebastian Bogner (SUI, 2547)

After 34...Qe6: the rook sits on c8, the a5 and b4 pawns are rolling. White to move.

Bishop beats knight, and the king marches

With the queens come off, and what is left is exactly the ending the whole game was heading for: rook and bishop against rook and knight, pawns on both wings, and an open position. That combination almost always favours the bishop, because from one square it serves both wings, while the knight needs three moves for every switch.

Then comes the second ingredient: , the king walks to the centre. In an endgame the king is a piece, and whoever puts it in the middle first wins most of the duels. Black had to fight back with , what was played is , and after the position is decided: the king on d4 controls e4, c5 and e5 at the same time.

Not everything afterwards was perfect. After the straight road was , and gave the opponent air once more. Such moments belong to every long ending. What matters is that the position was built so that one inaccuracy cost nothing.

IM Nderim Saraci (KOS, 2453)

GM Sebastian Bogner (SUI, 2547)

After 46...Rc6: the white king is on c3 and wants d4. White to move.

The final blow: 60.g4

Look at the king on e5. It is not standing in safety, it is standing in the attack, and that is exactly why the game is over here. With and White has pushed the black king to the edge, and now comes , the best move: after the bishop has a free road, and the black pawns on b7, a6 and g6 are all weak.

The rest is harvest. takes the first pawn, brings the king back to its best square, takes the last squares from the black king, and after Black resigned, because behind the rook the b4 and a5 pawns simply run.

The rule for your own endings: activate the king first, then start the pawns, in that order. A pawn advance without the king behind it is usually just an object to be collected in a rook ending.

IM Nderim Saraci (KOS, 2453)

GM Sebastian Bogner (SUI, 2547)

After 59...Rc3: the white king stands on e5, deep in enemy territory. White to move.

Verdict

A game without fireworks and with all the more substance. Against an International Master who made no gross error for more than sixty moves, Sebastian won with three tools anyone can learn: a retreat at the right moment (), thirty moves without a single weakness, and an ending in which bishop and king were faster than knight and king. The one real chance before the ending, , went begging, and that changes nothing about the verdict, because the position was never in danger. A full point on board one, and Switzerland takes the second round 3.5 to 0.5 as well.

Moves

1-0

Was this analysis useful?

BognerChess app · Waiting list

Analysis like this, for your own games

The AI coach in the new BognerChess app finds the critical moments of your games and explains them in plain words. Join the waiting list and be the first to try it.

Join the waiting list

Every board of round 2

Switzerland fielded four players. Each game is annotated on its own page.