IM Facundo Vazquez (URU, 2411) vs GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535) · ½-½
Board 2, Switzerland vs Uruguay · Catalan Opening, Open Defence, Classical Line (E05) · 90 minutes for 40 moves, then 30 minutes, plus 30 seconds per move
By Bogner AI Coach AI Coach . This analysis was written by a Bogner Chess AI coach.
Round 11, the closing round in Samarkand, Switzerland against Uruguay. On board two Nico Georgiadis sits with Black against IM Facundo Vazquez. Two boards higher up Sebastian Bogner has just steered his game against Georg Meier, sixty-five rating points ahead of him, into a technical draw, and the question on board two is the simple one: is the half point out of a Catalan with Black enough, or does Nico take more, as the rating would allow.
The Open Defence appeared with , and Nico gave up the bishop for the knight on move seven to double the white a-pawns. Through move twenty both sides played what they had to play, and the position stood at zero. On move twenty-one the clock was running, and Nico thought for a long time.
The bishop for the knight: 7...Bxa3
The Catalan Open Defence runs on an old accounting: Black takes the pawn on c4 on move six, and White collects it back with the knight to a3. The standard reply is , bishop for knight, so White must recapture with the pawn and double the a-pawns.
Nico played it in twenty-two seconds. The price is the bishop pair; the return is the doubled pawns on a2 and a3 that stand for the rest of the game, and the c-file that is open for the black rook. The move is the main line here, and Nico wanted the type of position it produces: a middlegame with two small imbalances, in which both sides have work to do.
The rule reaches further than the Catalan: when a knight is sent to the wing to fetch a pawn, bishop for knight is usually the right answer as soon as the recapture damages the white structure. A pawn that stands doubled works less than a pawn that stands on its own, and the difference is usually worth more than the bishop given for it.
IM Facundo Vazquez (URU, 2411)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
Fourteen minutes for 21...Na4
After the double rook trade on the a- and the b-file the position stood at zero, and Black had two natural moves: , the queen trade from his own hand, or , which attacks the white queen and leaves the queen trade to the opponent.
Nico chose after fourteen minutes. The move is no great sin, but it is the worse of the two. After White has the b-pawn in hand, and Black needs six precise moves to fetch back the white a-pawn: , then . In the main line the position sits level with the pawns on c5 and on a2 as mutual targets, and Black does not have to fetch back what he never gave up.
What separates the two moves is a good third of a pawn, so little. What separates the clock is more: after Nico stood at ten minutes for the last nineteen moves, and the thirty-second increment begins to count in this kind of position. The rule for such crossroads: when two plausible moves lie on the board and the clock runs without a decision falling, the simpler continuation is usually the right one. The trade Black plays is the trade Black controls.
IM Facundo Vazquez (URU, 2411)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
The account settled: 27...Nxa2
From onward Nico had one plan: the knight back to a2 via c3, the bishop to c6 against the white rook, the pawn to d5 against the white centre. Six moves, all of them the strongest, and on move twenty-seven the account stands: fetches the pawn back, and the position is level again.
The move looks unspectacular, but it is the reply to . What Black gave up in structure six moves earlier, he wins back here. After both sides have four pawns, the black bishop on c6 stands on an open diagonal, the white rook on b6 finds no target, and the game is ripe for the repetition.
The rule for defending after a disadvantage of your own making: the material you lost is the account you have to close before you think about the next target. The knight that moved for six moves around the white a-pawn is the account Nico closed.
IM Facundo Vazquez (URU, 2411)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
The repetition: 33...Ne4
From move twenty-nine onward the pieces shuttled around zero: the white knight from f3 to f1 to e3, the white rook from b3 to b6 and back, the black knight from a2 to c3 to e4. None of it was random, and both sides could see that neither wanted to take the first step out of balance.
Nico played , the move that put the position on the board a second time, and Vazquez answered . With that both shook hands. The black clock showed 4:30, the white one 18:06.
The rule for repetition is an old one: when the material counts, the pieces defend each other, and the opponent offers the repetition, you take it on the second occurrence. You do not go looking for the one move that shifts the balance, because it is not there, and the search costs the clock you have not yet spent in this round.
IM Facundo Vazquez (URU, 2411)
GM Nico Georgiadis (SUI, 2535)
Verdict
Half a point on board two with Black against an IM Nico should beat on paper, and half a point that he all but had to calculate after move twenty-one. shifts a good third of a pawn onto the white side and costs ten minutes of the twenty-four Black still had; from there the question was no longer whether more was on offer, but whether the pawn given up would come back. It did come back, with , and the repetition was the honest end.
Vazquez played the simple moves throughout, none of them gave the position away and none of them won it either; for an IM against an opponent rated one hundred and twenty-four points higher, that is the right statement. For the team the half point on board two goes into the table alongside the half point on board one, and the clock, which has already decided against Nico several times in this olympiad, closed in again here, but this time the balance had been settled before the time pressure counted.
Moves
½-½
Was this analysis useful?